From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cld: implement dynamic port Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:58:57 -0600 Message-ID: <20090916135857.773f9d8f@redhat.com> References: <20090902204858.7a3e34a9@redhat.com> <4AA7FBA0.9090307@garzik.org> <20090914121511.4dc5033e@redhat.com> <4AB012FD.3040502@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AB012FD.3040502@garzik.org> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Project Hail List On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:19:41 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 09/14/2009 02:15 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:01:52 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >> though for uniformity, I lean towards thinking that the daemon should > >> always write a port file, regardless of whether the port was manually > >> specified or automatically bound. > > > > I have a better idea. Let's split PortFile from the enabling > > of auto ports. We can have to with a special string "auto", > > and let to be set when static port is configured. > > I think that's fair... I have posted tabled already, so we have all three in exactly the same, old scheme now. I'll patch it over. Not sure if I can make it compatible though... There may be another flag day. Sorry. I realized my folly when /dev/null appeared. Probably would've fixed it anyway. -- Pete