From: test532@codingninjas.org
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:05:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909161705.18176.test532@codingninjas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrnhb2gbs.dbe.Mario.Holbe@darkside.dyn.samba-tng.org>
In the UK there is a law and it is being enforced. The pigs can force you to
give them your encryption key or throw you in jail. It is illegal to withhold
the key. If there is reasonable doubt that you even have a key, then you are
much better off and will probably remain free.
> Moji <lordmoji@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Plausible deniability has legal ramifications that are beneficial in
> > those more litigious societies, to which many people belong.
>
> In which ones?
>
> > This shifts the burden of proof to the opposing attorney/agency to prove
> > that random data represents information that you are obscuring.
>
> In which country is it possible for you to get convicted for something
> they assume but cannot proof because you don't give them the key to
> prove it on the one hand while it is not possible for them to force you
> to give them more on the other hand?
>
>
> regards
> Mario
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-12 21:53 [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability Ivan Stankovic
2009-09-12 22:22 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 8:56 ` Tommaso
2009-09-13 9:07 ` [dm-crypt] OT: spam? Tommaso
2009-09-13 9:12 ` Rick Moritz
2009-09-13 10:00 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-09-13 18:37 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:36 ` [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 19:44 ` Ivan Stankovic
2009-09-14 3:32 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-14 7:28 ` Rick Moritz
2009-09-14 21:04 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:04 ` Sven Eschenberg
[not found] ` <4AACA98F.2060002@redhat.com>
2009-09-13 18:28 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:52 ` Milan Broz
2009-09-14 1:21 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-09-14 11:25 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-14 20:56 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-14 23:45 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-15 0:04 ` test532
[not found] ` <6842.57094185359$1253045311@news.gmane.org>
2009-09-16 19:32 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:41 ` Debian User
2009-09-17 18:26 ` test532
2009-09-18 1:20 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-18 4:00 ` test532
[not found] ` <20090915200808.2DD0F4250006@tansi.org>
2009-09-15 20:32 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-16 19:41 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:30 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-16 1:50 ` Moji
2009-09-16 19:50 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:05 ` test532 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909161705.18176.test532@codingninjas.org \
--to=test532@codingninjas.org \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.