Re: [lm-sensors] unhide_ICH_SMBus: line 33:

[Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:48:43 +0200, Martin MOKREJ¦ wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:41:41 +0200, Martin MOKREJ¦ wrote:
> >> Jean Delvare wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:43:19 +0200, Martin MOKREJ¦ wrote:
> >>>> $ gzip -dc /proc/config.gz | grep THERMAL
> >>>> CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
> >>>> CONFIG_THERMAL=y
> >>>> CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON=y
> >>>> $ gzip -dc /proc/config.gz | grep ATK
> >>>> CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD=y
> >>>> CONFIG_SENSORS_ATK0110=y
> >>>> $
> >>>>
> >>>> These I have already in the kernel, so I can drop the whole SMbus thing?
> >>> Yes.
> >> Ooops, are we talking about I2C_I801=N, I2C=N or SENSORS_DS1621=N? ;-)
> > 
> > ENSORS_DS1621=N and I2C_I801=N, yes. I2C=N, bad idea, you might need
> > I2C support for something else.
> 
> $ sensors 
> max6657-i2c-4-4c
> Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at e800
> M/B Temp:  +39.1°C  (low  =   -55°C, high =  +127°C)   
> CPU Temp:  +49.2°C  (low  = +48.0°C, high = +62.0°C)   
> M/B Crit:    +85°C  (hyst =   +75°C)                  
> CPU Crit:    +75°C  (hyst =   +65°C)                  
> 
> $
> > 
> >> Actually I had SENSORS_LM90=Y as it was also proposed by sensors-detect.
> >> That one was also mis-detected?
> > 
> > I can't tell as your sensors-detect report was incomplete (with ds1621
> > loaded, sensors-detect can't probe the chip). I'm not sure why you are
> > hard-building all the drivers that way, BTW, it makes investigating
> > problems much harder. Probably the LM90 detection was correct, as these
> > chips are much more reliably detected than the DS1621.
> > 
> > Anyway, as further kernels say that ACPI is conflicting with the native
> > SMBus controller driver, the only safe bet is to drop i2c-i801 and go
> > with the ACPI thermal driver instead.
> 
> So doing that lm90 driver does not find any hardware chip and sensors
> do not see therefore anything either. modprob-ing ATK0110 driver surprisingly
> doesn't give anything either (lsmod reports it is unused and nothing new in
> dmesg). 
> 
> Dropping i2c-i801 seems like a bad idea. ;-)
> 
> What do you propose now? Some debug flags for insmod when inserting the atk*
> driver?

I propose that you read again what I already wrote before, because
apparently you didn't pay attention.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors