From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from op7.codingninjas.org (op7.codingninjas.org [209.222.52.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:28:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sschai.localnet (CPE0080c6e9d913-CM000f9f4fecc0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.249.56.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by op7.codingninjas.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFDE44E2219 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:30:40 -0400 (EDT) From: test532@codingninjas.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:26:37 -0400 References: <200909142004.49035.test532@codingninjas.org> <20090916214137.GC20202@tansi.org> In-Reply-To: <20090916214137.GC20202@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909171426.38117.test532@codingninjas.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de I blank out with random data any hard drive I no longer use (as it is too small, too slow, Etc). These are filled with just that, random data; No encrypted data left on those drives. = plausible deniability > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:32:39PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > > Sarah Dean wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:04:48 -0400, test532@codingninjas.org wrote: > > >>external luks header feature that Rick mentioned. dm-crypt comes with > > >>practically every linux. Therefor, having dm-crypt installed on one's > > >> system means nothing. > > > > dm-crypt on a system together with lots of random-like data just means > > something more. > > Indeed. And the presence of encrypted/random data can be tested for > with relatively low effort. > > Arno >