From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:47:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4] arm: remove unused code in delay.S In-Reply-To: <1253364929.3273.298.camel@linux-1lbu> References: <1253292418.3273.257.camel@linux-1lbu> <20090918190920.GB11461@pengutronix.de> <1253305534.3273.283.camel@linux-1lbu> <20090918205349.GM29905@game.jcrosoft.org> <1253364929.3273.298.camel@linux-1lbu> Message-ID: <20090919134731.GA11231@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Steve, On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:55:29AM -0500, Steve Chen wrote: > Document #if 0 code block in delay.S and make it selectable for compile. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Chen > Reviewed-by: Felipe Contreras > Reviewed-by: Jamie Lokier > Reviewed-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Halasa > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek > Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov > Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig I'm very surprised you added these Reviewed-by: tags. IMO you should not add them without the explicit permission and request of the corresponding person. (That means that at least mine should not be there.) Moreover Reviewed-by: has a meaning (described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches). Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |