From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:02:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Driver for Texas Instruments Message-Id: <20090921230257.1aa1b636.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <20090909093435.60531d95@hyperion.delvare> <20090905_120834_010267.tomaz.mertelj@guest.arnes.si> <20090908170649.855dd1ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090909093435.60531d95@hyperion.delvare> <5.1.0.14.2.20090922075153.00be9690@pop3.arnes.si> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20090922075153.00be9690@pop3.arnes.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tomaz Mertelj Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:59:14 +0200 Tomaz Mertelj wrote: > Should I post a patch on top of the original patch or a full patch to the > latest kernel tree? Either is OK for me. I'll turn it into an incremental patch so I can see what you changed. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754309AbZIVGE2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:04:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751379AbZIVGE1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:04:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:33613 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751364AbZIVGE0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:04:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:02:57 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tomaz Mertelj Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Driver for Texas Instruments amc6821 chip Message-Id: <20090921230257.1aa1b636.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20090922075153.00be9690@pop3.arnes.si> References: <20090909093435.60531d95@hyperion.delvare> <20090905_120834_010267.tomaz.mertelj@guest.arnes.si> <20090908170649.855dd1ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090909093435.60531d95@hyperion.delvare> <5.1.0.14.2.20090922075153.00be9690@pop3.arnes.si> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:59:14 +0200 Tomaz Mertelj wrote: > Should I post a patch on top of the original patch or a full patch to the > latest kernel tree? Either is OK for me. I'll turn it into an incremental patch so I can see what you changed.