From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:58:45 +0100
Subject: u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist,
	but being held)
In-Reply-To: <747C1E83C744F44E9ACFB89FAEEC2C7B11BC3EE46D@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local>
References: <747C1E83C744F44E9ACFB89FAEEC2C7B11BC3EE46D@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local>
Message-ID: <20090923035845.GF31920@trinity.fluff.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Srinidhi KASAGAR wrote:
> David,
> 
> I have posted a series of patches (u8500 machine support) today and one among them was 48K which was being held by the infradead server. Do you still consider the patches of size > 40 KB are suspects? Should I need to repost the whole patch series by splitting it to match 'your 40K' limit OR is there any possibility that the patch get posted to the list?
> 
> git format-patch -M did not help either. 

I've always felt that patches that big are probably too big to review
properly anyway. But that's just my personal view on the matter.

PS, word-wrap your postings to under 77 characters per line.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.