From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qing He Subject: Re: Re: Announcing xen/master: pvops git trees rearranged Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:17:06 +0800 Message-ID: <20090924031706.GA20387@ub-qhe2> References: <4AB431AD.1030205@goop.org> <4ABA8179.8060801@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ABA8179.8060801@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Christian Tramnitz , "Zhang, Xiantao" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 04:13 +0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 09/23/09 06:16, Christian Tramnitz wrote: > > are there plans to get any of the (non-bugfix) changes to upstream? > > I think the 2.6.32 merge window will close very soon right? > > No plans to put anything into .32. We need to have a solid story about > how to handle IOAPIC setup before pushing the rest, I think. I've just > restarted work on that, but I need to work out how to reconcile it with > the recent MSI work. > > J What's your current thinking on IOAPIC setup, still similar to that new-routing branch? I'd like to know about it so the MSI can adapt. And for a trap and emulation based MSI, the current logic may have to be changed. Currently I'm still trying to find an elegant solution, so I think you can do the IOAPIC work without much burden of MSI. Thanks, Qing