From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:48:44 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909241748.45629.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0909180755530.4950@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:08:02 am Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Side note: looking closer, I think our headers are buggy, and I _know_
> they are confusing. The above inline declaration of cpumask_of_node()
> seems to be then later overridden in <asm-generic/topology.h> by a
> #define!
>
> And if I read that right, that will also override the debugging
> versions that we declared if CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is on. Ingo?
> Rusty? Am I missing something?
What a tangle.
The CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS only overrides cpumask_of_node in the NUMA case
(otherwise, it leaves it alone).
And asm-generic/topology.h only defines cpumask_of_node in the !NUMA case.
But there's still redundancy. Ingo...
Subject: x86: remove redundant non-NUMA topology functions
arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h declares inline fns cpu_to_node
and cpumask_of_node for !NUMA, even though they are then declared as macros
by asm-generic/topology.h, which is #included just below.
The macros (which are the same) end up being used; these functions are
just confusing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -165,21 +165,11 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void)
return 0;
}
-static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static inline int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
{
return 0;
}
-static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
-{
- return cpu_online_mask;
-}
-
static inline void setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) { }
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 20:21 [git pull] first round of PCI updates for 2.6.32 Jesse Barnes
2009-09-16 14:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-16 15:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-17 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-17 17:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-17 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-17 18:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 7:59 ` [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 9:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-18 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 15:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-24 8:18 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-09-24 12:18 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Remove redundant non-NUMA topology functions tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2009-09-18 16:24 ` [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus Yinghai Lu
2009-09-18 16:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 17:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 15:27 ` [git pull] first round of PCI updates for 2.6.32 Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 16:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-17 17:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-17 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909241748.45629.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.