From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:19:37 +0800
References: <200909031406.49008.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
	<5161afcd0909282206w7e412a8ak3c9f5ad1f5ab878a@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090929052511.GZ16067@lunn.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20090929052511.GZ16067@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200909291719.37794.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mailing list migration (was: development flow)
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>

On Tuesday 29 September 2009 13:25:11 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > This is the best alternative that I have found.  They charge $4/month
> > for up to 1000 subscribers and 1-8 posts/day.
> 
> I would read the small print. We currently have 100 messages/month to
> a closed list. Once it is an open list, and well publicised, the
> amount of spam will increase dramatically. I personally get 100-200
> spams per day. Does this 1-8 posts per day include or exclude spam?

Ok, if this list is not going to make it I only see 2 options (feel free to 
add more):

* We drop the requirement to keep the domain name for the list and migrate 
everyone to the new list.
* We create the additional new list while keeping the old one. The new list is 
for the communication with the kernel developers.

Opinions ?

Regards,
Marek


PS: Big thanks to Jacob for digging into this.