All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: fix false errors due to macro concatenation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:46:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930174612.GE2957@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253585691-10987-1-git-send-email-dwalker@fifo99.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:14:47PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> The macro concatenation (##) sequence can cause false errors when checking
> macro's. Checkpatch doesn't currently know about the operator.
> 
> For example this line,
> 
> + 	entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data;                   \
> 
> is correct but it produces the following error,
> 
> ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxB)
> +       entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data;\
>                                           ^
> 
> The line above doesn't have any spacing problems, and if you remove the
> macro concatenation sequence checkpatch doesn't give any errors. This change
> resolves this by just always removing "##" in every line checked.

Ok, just removing these characters in the conversion changes the
relative length of the converted form and breaks position reporting for
other checks, for instance if I stupidly convert the ## to # so its
still invalid we then get this:

+	entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data; \

It is probabally more correct to include this <ident> ## <ident> form in
the definition of an identifier.  I've respun this patch to do just that
and it looks like its working as we would hope.

I will get this tested properly and add it to my next batch.

Perhaps you could test the version at the url below and see if it works
better:

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

NOTE: you want at least version 0.29-5-* which is in the process of
mirroring out.

-apw

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-30 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-22  2:14 [PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: fix false errors due to macro concatenation Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] checkpatch: fix hang in relative indent checking Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14   ` [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14     ` [PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: fix __attribute__ matching Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14       ` [PATCH 5/5] checkpatch: fix false EXPORT_SYMBOL warning Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 17:46         ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:28           ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-02  7:39             ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-30 17:46       ` [PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: fix __attribute__ matching Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:26         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-02  7:43           ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-22  6:29     ` [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist Li Zefan
2009-09-30 15:27       ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:18         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-06 19:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-06 20:50           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07  3:52             ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 10:17               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 14:26                 ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 14:44                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 14:57                     ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:11                       ` Alan Cox
2009-10-07 15:41                         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:52                           ` Alan Cox
2009-10-07 16:11                             ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:08                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 15:38                     ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 21:30                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 21:58                         ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 15:24   ` [PATCH 2/5] checkpatch: fix hang in relative indent checking Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-30 17:46 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2009-10-01 14:20   ` [PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: fix false errors due to macro concatenation Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090930174612.GE2957@shadowen.org \
    --to=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.