All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>
Cc: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][UHCI-DEBUG] Don't kmalloc with BKL held
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:51:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006075141.GA6650@gambetta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254573359.11691.0.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com>

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:35:59AM -0700, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 09:20 +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > Hi Sven-Thorsten,
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:12:24AM +0200, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> > > Subject: Don't kmalloc with BKL held.
> > > From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@suse.de>
> > > 
> > > I'm eyeballing this file for complete removal of lock_kernel but 
> > > at first glance, we definitely don't need BKL to kmalloc(). 
> > You need to move the unlock_kernel() above the out: label too.
> > 
> 
> How about this ?
Yes, looks good to me.

> 
> Subject: Don't kmalloc with BKL held.
> From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich sdietrich@suse.de Sat Oct 3 01:27:27 2009 -0700
> Date: Sat Oct 3 01:27:27 2009 -0700:
> Git: 4f62eb81e827eb857129101e49757d84ac9ee7eb
> 
> We don't need BKL to kmalloc
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> index e52b954..3fd5602 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> @@ -494,32 +494,30 @@ static int uhci_debug_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct uhci_hcd *uhci = inode->i_private;
>  	struct uhci_debug *up;
> -	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
>  	up = kmalloc(sizeof(*up), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!up)
> -		goto out;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	up->data = kmalloc(MAX_OUTPUT, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!up->data) {
>  		kfree(up);
> -		goto out;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	up->size = 0;
> +
> +	lock_kernel();
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&uhci->lock, flags);
>  	if (uhci->is_initialized)
>  		up->size = uhci_sprint_schedule(uhci, up->data, MAX_OUTPUT);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uhci->lock, flags);
>  
>  	file->private_data = up;
> -
> -	ret = 0;
> -out:
>  	unlock_kernel();
> -	return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static loff_t uhci_debug_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t off, int whence)
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-02  9:12 [PATCH][UHCI-DEBUG] Don't kmalloc with BKL held Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-10-02  9:20 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2009-10-03 12:35   ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-10-03 12:35     ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-10-06  7:51     ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2009-10-06 10:09     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-10-02 12:01 ` Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091006075141.GA6650@gambetta \
    --to=frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.