From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread().
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:40:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091009034003.GA7747@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005104955.GA14852@in.ibm.com>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:19:55PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:23:06PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > [ I noticed this whilst hacking up SH support, applies to the current
> > tracing/hw-breakpoints topic branch. ]
> >
> > flush_thread() tries to do a TIF_DEBUG check before calling in to
> > flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() (which subsequently clears the thread flag),
> > but for some reason, the x86 code is manually clearing TIF_DEBUG
> > immediately before the test, so this path will never be taken.
> >
> > This kills off the erroneous clear_tsk_thread_flag() and lets
> > flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() actually get invoked.
> >
>
> Yes, this is wrong and we missed it. Thanks for fixing!
>
> > Presumably folks were getting lucky with testing and the
> > free_thread_info() -> free_thread_xstate() path was taking care of the
> > flush there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
>
> Acked-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>
Ingo, are you planning on picking this up? Or is there a hw-breakpoints
tree somewhere outside of -tip that I'm unaware of?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 10:23 [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread() Paul Mundt
2009-10-05 10:49 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-09 3:40 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-10-09 7:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-17 23:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-18 6:25 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-18 16:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 19:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 23:24 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-20 7:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-21 13:36 ` [tip:perf/core] x86/hw-breakpoints: " tip-bot for Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091009034003.GA7747@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.