From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Harden against cpufreq
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:41:38 -0300
Message-ID: <20091012194138.GA14018@amt.cnet>
References: <4ACFA178.2040203@web.de> <1255141569-3572-1-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <1255141569-3572-2-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@kernel.vger.org
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60743 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757788AbZJLTmZ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:42:25 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1255141569-3572-2-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:26:08PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> If cpufreq can't determine the CPU khz, or cpufreq is not compiled in,
> we should fallback to the measured TSC khz.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.