From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>,
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ENOSPC at 94% full -- and causing BUGs elsewhere?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:31:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013103145.GC8830@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091012140935.GA8550@vlad.carfax.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:09:35PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:06:30AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:55:32PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > > I've just had the following on my home server. I believe that it's
> > > > btrfs that's responsible, as the machine wasn't doing much other than
> > > > reading/writing on a btrfs filesystem. The process that was doing so
> > > > is now stuck in D+ state, and can't be killed. The timing of the oops
> > > > at the end is also suggestive of being involved in the same incident.
> > > > This is the only btrfs filesystem on the machine.
> > >
> > > Patches have gone to Linus to fix the enospc problems. You can try running the
> > > enospc branch of Chris's git tree and it should behave better for you. Thanks,
> >
> > The right tree for this is the master branch of btrfs-unstable for
> > 2.6.31.
>
> Thanks, Josef and Chris. I've now found the time to check out and
> build the btrfs-unstable tree, and it is indeed handling the ENOSPC
> condition much more cleanly.
>
> However, it seems to have got into a position where I have lots of
> free space reported by df (over 10% of the size of the volume -- 185
> GiB free of 1474 GiB total), but still refuses to write anything to
> the filesystem. Do you have any suggestions for what I could try?
You've probably got most of that 10GB free allocated as metadata. You
could try btrfs-vol -b.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-03 12:21 ENOSPC at 94% full -- and causing BUGs elsewhere? Hugo Mills
2009-10-03 21:55 ` Josef Bacik
[not found] ` <20091004120630.GA19916@think>
2009-10-12 14:09 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 10:31 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-10-13 14:50 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 14:58 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-10-13 16:09 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 23:19 ` Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013103145.GC8830@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.