All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: "Ozan Çağlayan" <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Current status of rt2800usb and staging/rt2870
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:52:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910131752.52589.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD46380.9020308@pardus.org.tr>

Hi,
 
> In 2.6.31, there are USB device IDs common between both drivers.

That is because they are drivers for the same hardware.

> Should  a distribution enable both drivers? What do you suggest? Are there any
> *known issues* stuff for one of them?

The staging/rt2870 should actually be removed from the kernel tree,
I am going to merge rt2800pci soon as well and after that I'll send a patch
to remove all Ralink drivers from the staging tree.

As for known issues:
- staging/rt2870 is a piece of crap which apparently works for some people
but isn't generally stable or reliable
- wireless/rt2800usb follows the kernel coding style/rules and uses mac80211
but isn't showing a high quality for usability.

Ivo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-13 11:24 Current status of rt2800usb and staging/rt2870 Ozan Çağlayan
2009-10-13 15:52 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2009-10-13 17:27   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-13 18:17     ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-10-13 19:21       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-13 20:00         ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-10-13 20:42           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-13 20:15         ` Dan Williams
2009-10-13 21:57           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-13 22:21             ` Luis Correia
2009-10-14 14:14               ` John W. Linville
2009-10-13 22:24             ` Dan Williams
2009-10-13 22:42               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 14:15                 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-14  1:58             ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-10-14 13:51             ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-10-14 14:09             ` John W. Linville
2009-10-14 14:52               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 14:56                 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-14 15:28                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 16:47                     ` John W. Linville
2009-10-14 17:33                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 18:26                         ` Luis Correia
2009-10-14 20:41                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 18:56                         ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-10-14 20:10                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-15  6:28                             ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-10-15  9:47                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14 16:55                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-15 14:47                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-15 19:06                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-16 17:13                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-14  1:52         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-13 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-13 20:41   ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-10-13 20:44     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910131752.52589.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ozan@pardus.org.tr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.