From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Bus drivers don't have to support I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:50:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20091013225010.GA15469@fluff.org.uk> References: <20090930222244.43b8d17d@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090930222244.43b8d17d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > I2C bus drivers don't have to support I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR. It is a > deviation from the I2C specification, which only makes sense to > implement when really needed. Probably the right thing to do, does anything actually use this support? > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Ben Dooks > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-iop3xx.c | 6 ------ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 3 --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c | 2 -- I assume that I should merge this in my -next tree? -- Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'