[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Mount option trap for users

[Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 03:50:14PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Hmm, regarding this part of the discussion - how do we know if the admin
> actually wants the proposed behavior? Presumably the admin in our ext3
> example has a good reason for working without acls for a time. Perhaps the
> same admin would like that ability on a cluster node, without having to
> unmount from all acl nodes in the cluster...

	I would think anyone would want the acl behavior coherent across
the cluster.  Otherwise node 1 is setting an acl that node 2 promptly
ignores?  Yuk!  Especially since that admin could have accidentally
booted a non-ACL ocfs2 and not realize it?

> If we add cluster locking / messaging, etc to disallow this, we're removing
> a potentially valid use case.

	I don't know that it is valid.  But if we want to support it, we
can clearly differentiate between "my kernel doesn't support this" and
"I support it, but I was told noacl".

Joel

-- 

"Three o'clock is always too late or too early for anything you
 want to do."
        - Jean-Paul Sartre

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127