From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:38:59 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Mount option trap for users In-Reply-To: <20091014002752.GA19960@lst.de> References: <20090914145622.GK24075@duck.suse.cz> <20090914194404.GA28473@mail.oracle.com> <20090915092424.GB12169@duck.suse.cz> <20090917230037.GG11402@wotan.suse.de> <20091006171743.GF22781@duck.suse.cz> <20091013194615.GA23257@mail.oracle.com> <20091014002752.GA19960@lst.de> Message-ID: <20091014003859.GP23257@mail.oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:27:52AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:46:16PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > > Actually, I just realized where we really differ from the other > > filesystems. We're clustered, but CONFIG_OCFS2_POSIX_ACL isn't a > > feature flag. We can, in theory, have two nodes. Both have xattrs > > enabled, but only one has acls compiled into the kernel. Now we're > > fucked. > > As far as I can tell, there is no way for the non-acl driver to > > notice that other nodes are using acls and reject the mount. Thoughts? > > So why do you allow compiling ocfs2 without ACLs at all? You *are* paying attention :-) I believe this is for hysterical raisins. We copied ext3 on this. I'm totally in support of ripping ACLs out of Kconfig. Joel -- "I almost ran over an angel He had a nice big fat cigar. 'In a sense,' he said, 'You're alone here So if you jump, you'd best jump far.'" Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127