From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ursula Braun Subject: [patch 1/5] [PATCH] af_iucv: use sk functions to modify sk->sk_ack_backlog Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20091015090749.502120000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20091015085454.124154000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline; filename=601-af_iucv-use-sk-fns.diff Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, Hendrik Brueckner , Ursula Braun List-ID: From: Hendrik Brueckner Instead of modifying sk->sk_ack_backlog directly, use respective socket functions. Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun --- net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-next-uschi/net/iucv/af_iucv.c =================================================================== --- linux-next-uschi.orig/net/iucv/af_iucv.c +++ linux-next-uschi/net/iucv/af_iucv.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ void iucv_accept_enqueue(struct sock *pa list_add_tail(&iucv_sk(sk)->accept_q, &par->accept_q); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&par->accept_q_lock, flags); iucv_sk(sk)->parent = parent; - parent->sk_ack_backlog++; + sk_acceptq_added(parent); } void iucv_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk) @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ void iucv_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk) spin_lock_irqsave(&par->accept_q_lock, flags); list_del_init(&iucv_sk(sk)->accept_q); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&par->accept_q_lock, flags); - iucv_sk(sk)->parent->sk_ack_backlog--; + sk_acceptq_removed(iucv_sk(sk)->parent); iucv_sk(sk)->parent = NULL; sock_put(sk); }