Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module

[Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>]

On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:01:33 +0100
Vincent Hanquez <vincent@snarc.org> wrote:

> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 10/16/2009 11:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I already am :-)  Stay tuned, I should have a patch later this 
> >>> afternoon.
> >>
> >> Was it a race?  (Seriously, sorry I didn't notice a couple of hours 
> >> ago).
> >>
> >> This one is ~5% slower than the "Evil" one, but half the size.  
> >> Tested against the comments.json file from the "Evil" parser and with 
> >> valgrind too.  Does all the funky Unicode stuff too.
> >
> > I haven't benchmarked mine.  While yours came out an hour earlier, I 
> > included a full test suite, output QObjects, and support vararg 
> > parsing so I think I win :-)
> ar.. got mine too, i've been doing for the last 3 weeks slowly;

 Very nice to see all these contributions.

> it got a raw/pretty printer, an interruptible parser (on the same idea 
> as JSON_parser.c), it's faster than JSON_parser.c [1],
> it's completely generic (more like a library than an embedded thing), 
> fully JSON compliant (got a test suite too), support
> user supplied alloc functions, and callback for integer/float doesn't 
> have their data converted automatically which means
> that the user of the library can use whatever it want to support the 
> non-limited size JSON number (or just return errors for user that want 
> the limit).
> 
> the library by itself is 39K with -g last time i've looked.

 Integration with QObjects is a killer feature, I think it's the
stronger argument against grabbing one from the internet.