From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony_pi: Remove the BKL from sonypi_misc_open
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091021222758.GG4880@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910220001470.3526@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:06:32AM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> Okay, I'm sure there is something wrong in this methodology, but it's late
> at night. At least for a ballpark figure, hopefully it's right.
>
> Files that mentions "file_operations" -
> Files that mention "file_operations" and mention "llseek"
> = 1172 - 596 = 572 (in my particular git repo)
>
> So, over 550 files that need to be set to no_llseek, locked_llseek, or
> unlocked_llseek. Yikes!
>
> [jkacur@tycho rt.linux.git]$ git-grep -l file_operations | grep -v
> Documentation | wc -l
> 1172
> [jkacur@tycho rt.linux.git]$ git-grep -l llseek $(git-grep -l
> file_operations | grep -v Documentation) | wc -l
> 596
>
So much?
Ok, a default_lseek pushdown patch wouldn't be accepted :)
Well, I guess we first need to fix the sites that explicitly use the
bkl, one by one, and after that probably propose a new locked version but
without the bkl...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 21:54 [PATCH] sony_pi: Remove the BKL from sonypi_misc_open John Kacur
2009-10-19 4:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-19 18:20 ` John Kacur
2009-10-19 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-19 22:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-21 0:06 ` John Kacur
2009-10-21 8:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-21 10:27 ` John Kacur
2009-10-21 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-22 2:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-21 21:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-21 21:41 ` John Kacur
2009-10-21 21:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-21 22:06 ` John Kacur
2009-10-21 22:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-10-22 2:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-22 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-25 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 22:30 ` Mattia Dongili
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091021222758.GG4880@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arndbergmann@googlemail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.