From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: vmx problem Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:22:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20091022142221.GP1434@reaktio.net> References: <822920.40476.qm@web94606.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Fajar A." , Fasiha Ashraf , xen List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:12:04PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > VMX is hidden from guest kernels as it's not a feature they themselves can > make use of. Hence it does not appear in the guest's /proc/cpuinfo. > Any plans for 'nested' VMX support? KVM seems to have that.. -- Pasi