All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:48:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091023114825.GH5886@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE06644020000780001B4AD@vpn.id2.novell.com>


* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> Rather than forcing GFP flags and DMA mask to be inconsistent, GFP
> flags should be determined even for the fallback device through
> dma_alloc_coherent_mask()/dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags(). This
> restores 64-bit behavior as it was prior to commits
> 8965eb19386fdf5ccd0ef8b02593eb8560aa3416 and
> 4a367f3a9dbf2e7ffcee4702203479809236ee6e (not sure why there are two of
> them), where GFP_DMA was forced on for 32-bit, but not for 64-bit, with
> the slight adjustment that afaict even 32-bit doesn't need this without
> CONFIG_ISA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    4 +---
>  arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c          |    8 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h	2009-10-19 13:09:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.32-rc5-x86-dma-mask-gfp/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h	2009-10-22 10:54:08.000000000 +0200
> @@ -124,10 +124,8 @@ dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, s
>  	if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, &memory))
>  		return memory;
>  
> -	if (!dev) {
> +	if (!dev)
>  		dev = &x86_dma_fallback_dev;
> -		gfp |= GFP_DMA;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (!is_device_dma_capable(dev))
>  		return NULL;
> --- linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c	2009-10-19 13:09:45.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.32-rc5-x86-dma-mask-gfp/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c	2009-10-22 10:56:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -45,12 +45,14 @@ int iommu_pass_through __read_mostly;
>  dma_addr_t bad_dma_address __read_mostly = 0;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bad_dma_address);
>  
> -/* Dummy device used for NULL arguments (normally ISA). Better would
> -   be probably a smaller DMA mask, but this is bug-to-bug compatible
> -   to older i386. */
> +/* Dummy device used for NULL arguments (normally ISA). */
>  struct device x86_dma_fallback_dev = {
>  	.init_name = "fallback device",
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ISA
> +	.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(24),
> +#else
>  	.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> +#endif
>  	.dma_mask = &x86_dma_fallback_dev.coherent_dma_mask,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_dma_fallback_dev);

makes sense (although there were a few odd ends in various ISA sound 
driver details so this should go on the .33 not .32), but please 
introduce a cleaner construct, like a new DMA_ISA_BIT_MASK() or so.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 12:03 [PATCH] x86: adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations Jan Beulich
2009-10-23 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-10-26 15:13   ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-26 15:22     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 15:45       ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-26 20:19         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 20:44           ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-27  1:38           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-27  8:58             ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-27  9:00           ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-27  9:11             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-27  9:23               ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-27  9:37                 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-27  9:47                   ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-27 10:15                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-27 10:19                 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091023114825.GH5886@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.