From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:35:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091028153551.6c665ca1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256542744-26569-1-git-send-email-elendil@planet.nl>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:38:58 +0100
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
>
> Please consider this patch set for 2.6.32. It was previously submitted
> for 2.6.31, but AFAICT it has not yet been picked up.
>
> All patches have been acked by either Rui or Matthew, with the
> exception of 1/6 and 4/6, but the entire series has been implicitly
> acked by Rui in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c26.
>
> The patch set closes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918.
>
> Andrew, could you take the set just in case?
>
I'm trying to work out what the actual bug is in here.
afacit some KDE tool put wrong numbers into /proc files, acpi didn't
sanity check them sufficiently and permitted the CPU to overheat, yes?
There seems to be rather a lot of non-bugfix stuff in this patch
series. Perhaps too much for 2.6.32, and a real problem if we want to
backport something into 2.6.31.x and earlier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-26 7:38 [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] thermal: sysfs-api.txt - reformat for improved readability Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:11 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] thermal: sysfs-api.txt - document passive attribute for thermal zones Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:11 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] acpi: thermal: display forced passive trip points in proc Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:12 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] thermal: add sanity check for the passive attribute Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced_passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] thermal: disable polling if passive_delay and polling_delay are both unset Frans Pop
2009-10-28 22:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-10-28 22:49 ` [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:26 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091028153551.6c665ca1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sujith.thomas@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.