Re: is avoiding compat ioctls possible?

[Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@googlemail.com>]

On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > I'm just amazed that compat_ioctl should be required for all new code.
> > > 
> > > DrNick on irc suggested just doing:
> > > if (is_compat_task()) ptr &= 0x00000000FFFFFFFF;
> > 
> > Such hacks often have problems on BE.
> 
>  And then some platforms (i.e. MIPS) require sign-extension rather than 
> zero-extension, that is:
> 
> if (is_compat_task()) ptr = ((ptr & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
> 
> if doing this explicitly (with compat stuff hardware will do the right 
> thing automagically).

Such conversion should *only* ever take place in compat_ptr().

	Arnd <><