From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:43355 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932317AbZJ3PQP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:16:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:02:24 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Jarek Poplawski Cc: Johannes Berg , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Pekka Enberg , David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Message-ID: <20091030150223.GA2586@tuxdriver.com> References: <1256886023.3555.5.camel@johannes.local> <20091030110616.GB6150@ff.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20091030110616.GB6150@ff.dom.local> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:06:16AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > There are various ways to disagree, and ignoring by John questions > from a merited developer both in this referenced lkml and current > threads looks at least strange (if not offensive) as well. Did you read the thread for which Bartlomiej provided a link earlier? There were ten responses (only three of them from him) in that thread. His comments were not ignored, they were rejected. Ever since Bartlomiej decided to tear himself away from drivers/staging, he has been nothing but negative -- petty, whining, indignat, whatever. Just what has he done to merit any special consideration here? Why should he have any sort of veto over rt2x00? And of all things on which to take a stand -- how dare the rt2x00 guys use two header files instead of three? The nerve of those people!!! Ridiculous... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:02:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20091030150223.GA2586@tuxdriver.com> References: <1256886023.3555.5.camel@johannes.local> <20091030110616.GB6150@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Berg , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Pekka Enberg , David Miller , linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091030110616.GB6150-8HppEYmqbBCE+EvaaNYduQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:06:16AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > There are various ways to disagree, and ignoring by John questions > from a merited developer both in this referenced lkml and current > threads looks at least strange (if not offensive) as well. Did you read the thread for which Bartlomiej provided a link earlier? There were ten responses (only three of them from him) in that thread. His comments were not ignored, they were rejected. Ever since Bartlomiej decided to tear himself away from drivers/staging, he has been nothing but negative -- petty, whining, indignat, whatever. Just what has he done to merit any special consideration here? Why should he have any sort of veto over rt2x00? And of all things on which to take a stand -- how dare the rt2x00 guys use two header files instead of three? The nerve of those people!!! Ridiculous... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html