From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bnc at netspeed.com.au Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:51:41 +1000 Subject: [ath9k-devel] getting 11n to work? In-Reply-To: <20091030143141.GA4929@tux> References: <20091028204321.5dee58ad@bnc.JUSTUS> <20091029172259.33ea40cd@bnc.JUSTUS> <20091029145114.GA20419@tux> <20091030132909.05afb24b@bnc.JUSTUS> <20091030143141.GA4929@tux> Message-ID: <20091031005141.604f2b0f@bnc.JUSTUS> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Luis, Thanks for the explanation/s, understood. Unfortunately that leaves me with the problem that I do not understand why I am not connecting at 11n? I will try to set up some trace to investigate further. Brian On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:31:41 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:29:09PM -0700, bnc at netspeed.com.au wrote: > > Luis, > > I understood the difference between the two lists. > > I also understood from your previous remarks that because I had a > > single stream chip mcs7 was all I could get. > > Does this prevent me from using 11n though? > > No, MCS 1-7 are for 11n, what you have is an 802.11n single > stream device. > > > I am currently doing a compile on another laptop which I am pretty > > sure is multistream, so will test there too. > > > > I also noticed that from the list you get > > HT MCS set: ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > but on the multistream you get > > HT MCS set: ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > What does the second set of ff mean? > > The MCS set is parsed and is where we get the supported MCS indexes. > I am too lazy to check the exact location of the second ff here but > mostl likely it parse out to the other set of MCS indexes. In other > words you can ignore the MCS set print out as it is already parsed > by iw list anyway. > > Luis > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel