From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from maude.comedia.it (maude.comedia.it [77.93.254.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maude.comedia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1892686F3C for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from maude.comedia.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maude.comedia.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id ptRYcfXeCkFe for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:12:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:12:40 +0100 From: Luca Berra Message-ID: <20091031081240.GA18686@maude.comedia.it> References: <1256933154.21609.14.camel@markov.biostat.ucsf.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1256933154.21609.14.camel@markov.biostat.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] advice on encrypted snapshots List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:05:54PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: >Does anyone have any advice about how to snapshot an encrypted volume so >that the snapshot won't leak information? > Do you mean linux-lvm snapshot or some storage based one? In the first case I think the safest way is encrypting the PV. L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \