From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jurij Smakov Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:08:47 +0000 Subject: Re: Sparc release requalification Message-Id: <20091031150847.GA9010@droopy.oc.cox.net> List-Id: References: <4AA427E6.5000801@nerim.net> In-Reply-To: <4AA427E6.5000801@nerim.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03:37AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:19:39AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > >> I built my kernel using v2.6.30.x -stable FWIW. > > >> > > >> I'll try straight 2.6.31 with your config. I wonder if we're > > >> in the territory of some compiler issue. > > > > > > I'm guessing that compile is finished by now :) can you please post the link > > > for me to try and boot? > > > > I didn't get around to it, I have to run off now to LinuxCon and > > LinuxPlumbers so all of this will have to wait 2 weeks. > > > > Sorry. > > FWIW I've since compiled and tested latest stable .30, .29 and .28, just to > make sure I'm not hitting a heisenbug, but the symptoms are unchanged for > .30 and .29, while .28 works. The compiler is the Debian 'stable' sparc gcc, > nothing fancy there. Josip, did you manage to figure out what's going on here? Did we conclude it is a toolchain issue? Cheers. -- Jurij Smakov jurij@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC