From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:04:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911032204.51085.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911032132.31533.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:32:30 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > rt2800pci patch itself has been getting dust in your tree since at least
> > April (it hasn't received any bigger updates since then)..
>
> And how many times do I have to repeat the reason?
> I think that after dozens of mails, the message should have been clear, especially
> to somebody who apparently has been monitoring and worrying about the development
> process for the last 2 years....
Just for the record:
I got only interested in rt2x00 support around April this year (while I was
doing major staging cleanups everywhere) and I was hearing back then that
rt2800pci will be merged "really soon" and that the project is making "great
progress"..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 21:10 pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 John W. Linville
2009-10-28 21:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 11:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 12:15 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 12:15 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 12:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 12:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 12:59 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 12:59 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 13:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 13:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-29 14:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 14:21 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 14:39 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-29 14:39 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-29 14:44 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-10-29 14:48 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-29 14:48 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-29 15:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-29 15:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-29 17:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 19:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-29 21:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 21:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-30 5:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-30 5:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-30 7:00 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-30 11:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-30 15:02 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-30 15:02 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-30 20:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-30 20:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-01 19:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-01 19:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-02 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 9:23 ` Johannes Berg
2009-11-02 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 17:01 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-02 17:01 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-02 17:32 ` Luis Correia
2009-11-02 17:36 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-02 18:29 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-02 18:29 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-02 18:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-02 18:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-03 19:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-03 20:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-03 21:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-11-02 21:16 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-04 13:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-11-04 21:17 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-04 21:17 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-04 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-04 22:09 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-02 16:46 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-30 15:14 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-29 13:53 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 14:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 14:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-29 14:20 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 14:20 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 14:24 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-29 14:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911032204.51085.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=luis.f.correia@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.