From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755631AbZKDMPb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755308AbZKDMPa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55749 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754959AbZKDMPa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:15:20 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t Message-ID: <20091104121520.GC16993@elte.hu> References: <200911031454.09261.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911031454.09261.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rusty Russell wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > To: Ingo Molnar > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++-- > arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Mind sending this against latest -tip? We already have: b8a4754: x86, msr: Unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus which makes your patch not apply: patching file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 247. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h patching file arch/x86/lib/msr.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 78. Hunk #2 FAILED at 107. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/lib/msr.c Thanks, Ingo