From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:30:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:30:51 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20091104173051.GA4660@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20091104165200.66F5A7BD6E@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091104165200.66F5A7BD6E@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Crack a dm-LUKS partition or harddisk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 04.11.2009, Si St wrote: > Do we have a crack-password-delay-mechanism as a part of the encryption See the option "--iter-time" in the cryptsetup manual, and look for "iteration count" related to PBKDF2.