From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@web.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Any results from BattleMesh 2009?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:49:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105024904.GA29859@Linus-Debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF21525.3080008@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1628 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0800, Gus Wirth wrote:
> I see on the OpenWRT site that there was supposed to be a Wireless
> Battle Mesh a couple weeks ago. Does anyone have some results from
> the event?
>
> Gus
Hi Gus,
yes, there was the 2nd Wireless Battle Mesh a couple of weeks ago
in Brussels and also a bunch of BATMAN fans/devs had been there
:). The results have mostly been of individual tests, every one of
those groups was installing their protocols and daemons on those
tiny Fonera routers and did mostly debugging, testing and
bug-hunting or general layer 1 wifi tests (which turned out to be
the most broken one ;) ). All in all every group was pretty quick
at providing a set of configurations and proving, that their
daemons were running stable on a current OpenWRT trunk version.
The WBMII people are going to submit a more detailed report in
the next couple of weeks.
From the BATMAN side, it was a great chance for a face to face
meeting and we used most of the time for discussions about the
veeery soon to come next stable BATMAN-Adv release and
ideas and plans for the development of the next version (which
will basically be getting ready for and into the linux mainline
kernel and making BATMAN responding to changes faster). We will
also be going to write a little summary of the event and its
results and conclusions for BATMAN, which will be published in the
next couple of days in the open-mesh-wiki. So stay tuned :).
Cheers, Linus
PS: Just out of curiosity and also because the reports are in
progress right now, what kind of results are you expecting?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 23:58 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Any results from BattleMesh 2009? Gus Wirth
2009-11-05 2:49 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2009-11-05 17:20 ` Gus Wirth
2009-11-05 17:26 ` Steven Leeman
2009-11-06 10:17 ` L. Aaron Kaplan
2009-11-06 14:35 ` Benjamin Henrion
2009-11-06 14:48 ` L. Aaron Kaplan
2009-11-06 14:57 ` Benjamin Henrion
2009-11-06 15:12 ` Steven Leeman
2009-11-06 15:51 ` L. Aaron Kaplan
2009-11-05 9:52 ` Carcellelist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105024904.GA29859@Linus-Debian \
--to=linus.luessing@web.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.