From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc5-mmotm1101 - lockdep whinge during early boot
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:33:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105153321.GB24690@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091105152241.GA24690@redhat.com>
On 11/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 11/05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, we fixed all this lock madness in mainline already.
> > clocksource_done_booting() does not longer call
> > create_workqueue(). How got this code reverted in motm ?
>
> I don't understand this code at all. But this is what I see
> in Linus's tree:
>
> clocksource_done_booting
> clocksource_select
> timekeeping_notify
> stop_machine
> stop_machine_create
>
>
> OTOH, I don't see where native_cpu_up() path calls clocksource_change_rating(),
> perhaps this was changed in -mm.
I believe Martin knows the answer:
On 11/05, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> That is imho caused by this patch snippet from the linux-next.patch from mmotd:
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c~linux-next arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c~linux-next
> +++ a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -763,14 +763,12 @@ void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reason)
> {
> if (!tsc_unstable) {
> tsc_unstable = 1;
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Marking TSC unstable due to %s\n", reason);
> + printk("Marking TSC unstable due to %s\n", reason);
> /* Change only the rating, when not registered */
> if (clocksource_tsc.mult)
> - clocksource_mark_unstable(&clocksource_tsc);
> - else {
> - clocksource_tsc.flags |= CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE;
> + clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 16:11 2.6.32-rc5-mmotm1101 - lockdep whinge during early boot Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-11-05 9:11 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-05 14:54 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-05 14:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-05 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-05 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-11-05 15:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-05 16:20 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-05 16:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 9:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105153321.GB24690@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@googlemail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.