From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] generic compat_sys_sysctl Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:27:24 +0100 Message-ID: <200911061127.25337.arnd@arndb.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:64963 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755164AbZKFK3R (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:29:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Ralf Baechle , Kyle McMartin , Thibaut Varene , Carsten Otte , Christian Borntraeger , "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" On Friday 06 November 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > current architecture name for it's 32bit compat syscall with > compat_sys_sysctl, and deleting the architectures private > 32bit compat syscall. The only requirement is that CONFIG_COMPAT > be set when you need compat_sys_sysctl. > > These patches should just work, but an eyeball from someone who is > familiar with the architecture specific details would be appreciated. > I have only tested the 32bit compat code on x86_64. I have done similar conversions for other syscalls and am familiar with s390 and powerpc specific details. Your compat code looks good for all of the pitfalls I'm aware of and possibly fixes bugs in the existing arch specific implementations. Very nice series! Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann