From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 235xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6Upa-0004rm-33 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:50:46 +0000 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]) by 29vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1N6UpW-0003H6-Hl for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:50:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:50:36 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Message-ID: <20091106195036.GG819@basil.fritz.box> References: <20091106095745.GA25377@basil.fritz.box> <364299f40911061004mbb02ed3lf02a33164890625a@mail.gmail.com> <20091106191343.GC819@basil.fritz.box> <200911061439.22257.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911061439.22257.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP 20091031 Makefiles totally broken?!? List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Mike Frysinger Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Andi Kleen On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 03:39:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2009 14:13:43 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I've considered adding a configure check for the make version. I'm > > > probably going to do it this weekend to avoid support issues like > > > these. > > > > That's not a solution. > > > > Please just fix the makefiles or revert this misguided change > > and give us working makefiles back. > > > > From a quick look at the mailing list archives that doesn't > > even seem to be the only problem with this "improvement". > > again, please stop wasting our time with your "revert it" comments. it isnt That's the standard strategy to fix regressions if the submitter is unwilling to fix newly introduced bugs. > going to happen. especially considering you apparently have no signficant > plans in helping maintain the huge code base that is LTP. I submitted some tests and fixes in the past, but yes I'm primarily a user. > we can look at working around bugs in make-3.80 if/since there are a number of > people who would like this functionality. Are you saying that LTP as a project is not interested in fixing regressions? -Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list