From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, therm: Only read the initial value of thermal LVT entry on BSP
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:16:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091108131655.GA12837@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091108123812.GA877@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>
* Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:25:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > i dont disagree with the fix, but could we please do it a bit cleaner,
> > and initialize a proper file-scope lvtthrm_init value from a different
> > boot-CPU-only function? (not intel_init_thermal)
> >
>
> Thanks for your comments. Just want to make sure I understand correctly.
> By 'file-scope', do you want me to define lvtthrm_init as a static
> variable but not to define it in any function?
Correct - i'd suggest to put it next to other file-scope variables at
the top of the .c file. Maybe make it __read_mostly as well.
> > that makes it cleaner, and also it will work if we dont boot on
> > cpu==0. (should that ever occur)
> >
>
> May I know when will this happen?
It's not really expected - we factorize the CPU IDs (which are logical)
so that the boot CPU is 0. But relying on cpu==0 is the boot cpu is not
clean and the resulting code is harder to read.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-08 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-07 0:17 [PATCH] x86, therm: Only read the initial value of thermal LVT entry on BSP Yong Wang
2009-11-07 2:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-11-07 9:52 ` Yong Wang
2009-11-08 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-08 12:38 ` Yong Wang
2009-11-08 13:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-08 13:19 ` Yong Wang
2009-11-08 15:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-08 13:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-06 5:46 Yong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091108131655.GA12837@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.