Bazaar as main repository

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2327 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 01:04:48AM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:40:06PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >   
> >> What's preventing of using it as a main repository? This should allow
> >> easy resync
> >
> > Historically, it's been very hard for us to reach consensus on which revision
> > control system to use.  When we settled on SVN, it happened because we were
> > all fed up with CVS, not because it completely satisfied everyone.  In fact,
> > it was Bean who proposed it, even if he used GIT himself at the time!
> >
> > Other developers were unsatisfied with this decision, but chose not to object
> > to it just so we could get rid of CVS.
> >
> > Since a very wide consensus was reached, and it was so hard to archieve it,
> > I'm very reluctant to push for Bazaar as our trunk repository unless everyone
> > agrees this is what we want.
> >
> > Personally, I prefer if we did this switch, but I also think SVN does a good
> > job at managing a trunk.  I don't mind living with it for the time being.
> >
> > When I feel something is important, I don't hesitate to use my authority as
> > maintainer, but in this case I don't consider it necessary.  That said, if
> > I see consensus that we should switch to Bazaar as main repository, I won't
> > be the one to stop it.
> >
> >   
> Even though I'm git user and only bzr newbie, now when I started to
> learn it I like it and am for its adoption as main repo

Hi,

Vladimir would like to do this move;  I would like too, and can only assume
that Colin Watson would be satisfied with it.

So far nobody protested, and we finally sorted out the corruption problems.

I stop resyncing with SVN now.  All developers are encouraged to commit
directly to Bazaar (either trunk, experimental or personal branch depending
on the nature of changes).

Please remember to use sftp:// protocol, NOT bzr+ssh://.  If/when Savannah
upgrades their bzr daemon, we might consider using bzr+ssh:// in the future.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]