From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: OEDEM: Summary of 'OE and Poky', 'Hosting', 'Bugtracker'
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:14:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091110151412.GF3998@excalibur.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257864635.5228.17.camel@opal>
Hello.
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 15:50, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 10.11.2009, 14:27 +0100 schrieb Stefan Schmidt:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:07, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > >
> > > We will do changes on the git layout, e.g. org.oe.dev is becoming
> > > 'master'
> > > and user branches will live in a seperate repository.
> >
> > While I can understand the former I can't see the reason for the later. Can you
> > explain why that was decided?
>
> The major two reasons were clarity and access control.
>
> Clarity: Reducing the number of branches in the main tree to master and
> a bunch of topic-branches was perceived as a good thing.
ok
> Access control: Having user branches in a dedicated tree means we can
> give more users commit access so that they can prepare branches we can
> pull. This might lead to (IMHO much appreciated) improvements in the
> development model towards a pull model.
But why the hassle of administrate an own git repo service for this? I always
thought OE was small on admin power.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-10 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 13:07 OEDEM: Summary of 'OE and Poky', 'Hosting', 'Bugtracker' Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-11-10 13:27 ` Stefan Schmidt
2009-11-10 14:35 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-11-10 15:09 ` Stefan Schmidt
2009-11-10 14:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-10 15:06 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-11-10 14:50 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-11-10 15:14 ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2009-11-10 15:38 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-10 15:54 ` Stefan Schmidt
2009-11-10 15:52 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
[not found] ` <be7a9f3d0911100914o45d3526fufb4338966b9cdc33@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-10 17:19 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-10 18:35 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-11-11 1:07 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-11 8:29 ` Phil Blundell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091110151412.GF3998@excalibur.local \
--to=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.