From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
lenb@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi_processor_get_bios_limit)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:09:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112100956.fc72080e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091112094012.2ef401ad.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20091111:
> >
> > The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree.
>
> when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit':
> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit'
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
>
>
> The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline"
> at line 323.
---
however, even with that fixed, when
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_ACPI=n
CONFIG_SFI=y
CONFIG_APM=y
there is this build error:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c:720: error: 'acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' undeclared here (not in a function)
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 8:51 linux-next: Tree for November 12 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 11:53 ` -next: Nov 12 - kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:7359! Sachin Sant
2009-11-12 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 12:23 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-12 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 9:00 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-13 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 9:58 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-11-13 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 11:44 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-13 16:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-23 9:53 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-25 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-26 4:39 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-04 12:06 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-04 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-07 6:16 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-12 7:09 ` Max Krasnyansky
2009-11-12 17:40 ` linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi/processor.h) Randy Dunlap
2009-11-12 18:09 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-11-12 23:46 ` [PATCH -next] staging/line6: fix printk formats Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112100956.fc72080e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.