From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [72.14.220.157] (helo=fg-out-1718.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N8aVd-0004lB-AE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:18:52 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1910520fga.6 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.104.7 with SMTP id b7mr247551fgc.34.1258031132437; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from xora-eee (www.xora.org.uk [80.68.91.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm6866751fga.3.2009.11.12.05.05.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:05:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:05:28 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091112130528.GB2239@xora-eee> References: <200911120656.41249.holger+oe@freyther.de> <200911120722.09166.holger+oe@freyther.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.14.220.157 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: xterm: either fix it, or remove it. please. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:18:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 07:58:23AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > PS: Personally I think it is a bad idea to change the output format of > > a utility that is more than 30 years old and that is so widespread. > > i have to agree but, frankly, i'm astonished that that fundamental a > change caused breakage in only one package out of about 10,000 (i > tripped across that building beagleboard-demo-image -- it was the only > package that failed because of that; i actually think that shows an > amazing level of robustness). > And it doesnt make it fail here, selinux enabled, can see the extra . in my normal ls commands. xterm still builds fine. G