From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: rhlee <richard@webdezign.co.uk>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Subject: Re: Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258037862366-3993313.post@n2.nabble.com>
The 12/11/09, rhlee wrote:
> Nicolas Sebrecht-3 wrote:
> >
> >> Yes I know I probably should not be
> >> working like this. My branches should be wholly independent. But I doing
> >> web
> >> development not kernel development so there is much less modularity and
> >> branches/features have a tendency to creep into one another.
> >
> > This should not be the case. Modularity in the release process and the
> > development strategy is not tied to "what I am developing". I'm doing
> > some web development too and have no difficulty around this point.
>
> Just to clarify. Do you mean that this should not be the case that you get
> feature creep in branches or the fact that this happens does interfere with
> your release process/development strategy.
I mean that the independency of the feature branches is mostly relying
on "what do I (as a developer) commit in this branch", which is really
tied to "how to write nice atomic commits" (easily reversible, etc).
This must be applicable whatever the product/software you're working on
and it is applicable for web development too.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 17:16 Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master rhlee
2009-11-11 21:57 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-12 12:48 ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 16:49 ` rhlee
2009-11-26 12:45 ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 14:57 ` rhlee
2009-11-12 15:14 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@webdezign.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.