From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: + memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:27:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911122127.nACLRMXM029749@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
mem_cgroup_move_parent() calls try_charge first and cancel_charge on
failure. IMHO, charge/uncharge(especially charge) is high cost operation,
so we should avoid it as far as possible.
This patch tries to delay try_charge in mem_cgroup_move_parent() by
re-ordering checks it does.
And this patch renames mem_cgroup_move_account() to
__mem_cgroup_move_account(), changes the return value of
__mem_cgroup_move_account() from int to void, and adds a new
wrapper(mem_cgroup_move_account()), which checks whether a @pc is valid
for moving account and calls __mem_cgroup_move_account().
This patch removes the last caller of trylock_page_cgroup(), so removes
its definition too.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 7 --
mm/memcontrol.c | 84 ++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/page_cgroup.h~memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent include/linux/page_cgroup.h
--- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h~memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent
+++ a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageCgroup##unam
static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
{ return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
+TESTPCGFLAG(Locked, LOCK)
+
/* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
CLEARPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
@@ -86,11 +88,6 @@ static inline void lock_page_cgroup(stru
bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
}
-static inline int trylock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
-{
- return bit_spin_trylock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
-}
-
static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
{
bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-cleanup-mem_cgroup_move_parent
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1613,27 +1613,22 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(s
}
/**
- * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
* @pc: page_cgroup of the page.
* @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
* @to: mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
*
* The caller must confirm following.
* - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
- *
- * returns 0 at success,
- * returns -EBUSY when lock is busy or "pc" is unstable.
+ * - the pc is locked, used, and ->mem_cgroup points to @from.
*
* This function does "uncharge" from old cgroup but doesn't do "charge" to
* new cgroup. It should be done by a caller.
*/
-static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
{
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
- int nid, zid;
- int ret = -EBUSY;
struct page *page;
int cpu;
struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat;
@@ -1641,20 +1636,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
VM_BUG_ON(from == to);
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page));
-
- nid = page_cgroup_nid(pc);
- zid = page_cgroup_zid(pc);
- from_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
- to_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
-
- if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc))
- return ret;
-
- if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
- goto out;
-
- if (pc->mem_cgroup != from)
- goto out;
+ VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupLocked(pc));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc));
+ VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from);
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1683,15 +1667,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
css_get(&to->css);
pc->mem_cgroup = to;
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true);
- ret = 0;
-out:
- unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
/*
* We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
* can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
* this function is just force_empty() and it's garanteed that
* "to" is never removed. So, we don't check rmdir status here.
*/
+}
+
+/*
+ * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
+ */
+static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+ struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+ if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
+ __mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
return ret;
}
@@ -1713,38 +1710,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct
if (!pcg)
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
+ goto out;
+ if (isolate_lru_page(page))
+ goto put;
parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg);
-
-
ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, page);
if (ret || !parent)
- return ret;
-
- if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto uncharge;
- }
-
- ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
-
- if (ret)
- goto cancel;
+ goto put_back;
ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent);
-
+ if (!ret)
+ css_put(&parent->css); /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
+ else
+ mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent); /* does css_put */
+put_back:
putback_lru_page(page);
- if (!ret) {
- put_page(page);
- /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
- css_put(&parent->css);
- return 0;
- }
reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911122127.nACLRMXM029749@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.