From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:20:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113162050.7469ed84@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911140214.21493.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:14:21 +0200
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 November 2009 02:04:45 you wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:20:19 +0200
> >
> > Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 November 2009 07:01:14 you wrote:
> > > > This patch speeds up the network device name allocation for the case
> > > > where a significant number of devices of the same type are created
> > > > consecutively.
> > > >
> > > > Tests performed on a PPC750 @ 800Mhz machine with per device sysctl
> > > > and sysfs entries disabled:
> > > >
> > > > Without the patch With the patch
> > > >
> > > > real 0m 43.43s real 0m 0.49s
> > > > user 0m 0.00s user 0m 0.00s
> > > > sys 0m 43.43s sys 0m 0.48s
> >
> > Since the main overhead here is building the bitmap table used in the
> > name scan. Why not mantain the bitmap table between calls by
> > implementing a rbtree with prefix -> bitmap.
> > The tree would have to be limited and per namespace but then you
> > could handle the general case of adding a device, then its vlans,
> > then another device, ...
> >
>
> I'll do that !
>
> That was my original intent but I thought it would be too much bloat :) But I
> see your point, even if it is more complex, its more useful.
There might even be a VM notifier hook that could be used to drop the whole
tree if any memory pressure was felt.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 5:01 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 5:20 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 6:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 7:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 9:51 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 22:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 22:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:35 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 23:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:52 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 2:59 ` David Miller
2009-11-14 6:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 22:36 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-15 1:49 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:55 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-11-15 7:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-15 16:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 7:08 ` Benny Amorsen
2009-11-14 7:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-13 9:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 16:40 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-14 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-14 0:14 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-14 0:20 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113162050.7469ed84@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.