From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>,
Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>,
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <junio@pobox.com>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up bash completion loading
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:43:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091114144303.GA31540@neumann> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091114110141.GB1829@progeny.tock>
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:01:41AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > I see a small problem, but it can be fixed in another patch. git
> > merge -s <TAB><TAB> the first time when you're not in a git
> > directory will make git merge -s <TAB><TAB> after never complete
> > correctly even in a git directory.
>
> Not good. I think the sanest thing to do is avoid caching the merge
> strategy list entirely. Listing merge strategies takes about 100 ms
> here, which is short enough not to be annoying.
>
> > I guess this become more serious
> > if git isn't in your path initially and you do git <TAB><TAB> and
> > then git becomes part of your path and you try again. Here you lose
> > porcelain completion. This is probably never going to happen though,
> > right?
>
> Right, if this happened to me I would not be too surprised. A similar
> problem occurs when someone installs a new git subcommand in the
> middle of a session. Starting a new session fixes the completion, but
> should the completion script do something to help people before then?
>
> It could provide a shell function with a slightly friendlier name than
> "__git_compute_porcelain_commands" for the user to invoke explicitly.
>
> It could retry "git help -a" each time completion was needed if it
> gave no results last time (i.e. use "${__git_all_commands:=" instead
> of "${__git_all_commands="). This would help with the missing git
> problem (which seems unusual), but not the missing git-svn.
>
> Maybe it could detect signs of user frustration (repeated attempts to
> complete the same thing?) and add to the frustration by silently
> fixing the cache.
Why? Don't get overly creative here, the command
. /path/to/git-completion.bash
already does that, plus it fixes the merge strategy completion issue,
and it's friendly enough for the users.
Best,
Gábor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 9:34 excerpts from tomorrow's "What's cooking" draft Junio C Hamano
2009-11-11 16:33 ` Ben Walton
2009-11-11 17:07 ` Johan Herland
2009-11-11 17:57 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-11 18:45 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-11-15 2:07 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-15 2:49 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-11-11 22:08 ` ks/precompute-completion Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-13 6:40 ` ks/precompute-completion Stephen Boyd
2009-11-13 7:06 ` ks/precompute-completion Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-13 7:12 ` ks/precompute-completion Stephen Boyd
2009-11-13 8:50 ` [PATCH] Speed up bash completion loading Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-13 9:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-13 10:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-13 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-14 10:35 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-14 11:01 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-14 14:43 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2009-11-14 19:33 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-14 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-15 6:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-15 9:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-15 10:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-16 1:55 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-11-16 8:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-18 0:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Jonathan Nieder
2009-11-18 0:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-11-11 18:42 ` excerpts from tomorrow's "What's cooking" draft Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-11 19:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-11 21:07 ` Petr Baudis
2009-11-11 21:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-11 21:26 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-11 21:42 ` Petr Baudis
2009-11-11 22:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-11 22:24 ` [PATCH] give priority to progress messages Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-11 18:54 ` excerpts from tomorrow's "What's cooking" draft Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091114144303.GA31540@neumann \
--to=szeder@ira.uka.de \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=junio@pobox.com \
--cc=kirr@mns.spb.ru \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.