From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next] bnx2x: Handle Rx and Tx together in NAPI Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:05:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091116.030504.268003197.davem@davemloft.net> References: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B950BEF@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> <20091116.024130.156214496.davem@davemloft.net> <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B950BFF@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vladz@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eilong@broadcom.com To: B05799@freescale.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56084 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751864AbZKPLEs (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:04:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B950BFF@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:33:56 +0530 > I was talking about an independent napi routine for cleaning tx ring, I > do not want to mix the rx and tx clean ring processes. But you absolutely should do this, it will give optimal performance.