From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.208.49.253] (helo=mengele.ibawizard.net ident=postfix) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N9wUx-0002fF-FJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:59:46 +0100 Received: by mengele.ibawizard.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 7DC611D36078; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:58:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:58:16 +0100 From: Petr =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9tetiar?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091116075816.GF32004@ibawizard.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.208.49.253 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ynezz@mengele.ibawizard.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: any ETA on a working dev beagleboard demo image? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:59:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Robert P. J. Day [2009-11-15 09:56:36]: > or perhaps start a branch named, oh, "bleeding", which, when it builds > properly, can be merged back into development. whatever. but it > strikes me that it's overwhelmingly pointless to have a development > branch that doesn't build since that gives no one the opportunity to > actually test it. Bleeding = dev, for me at least. I had problems with building dev on Ubuntu 8.10(some weird host setup, like gcc and includes) so I upgraded to 9.04 and I can build beagleboard-demo-image again. Last time I tried it was yesterday. -- ynezz