From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Kdump issue with percpu_alloc=lpage
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:33:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091119143343.GB8741@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B03BD7A.9040500@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:25:14PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 10/29/2009 06:22 AM, John Blackwood wrote:
> >> Thanks Tejun. percpu_to_phys() makes sense to me also. John, would you
> >> like to post a patch for this.
> >
> > Hi Vivek,
> >
> > I'm probably not really NUMA/vm savy enough to attempt a patch
> > for approval at LKML.
> >
> > But maybe someone else more qualified can take up the cause.
>
> Is this still necessary for the current upstream where lpage allocator
> is gone (but vmalloc mapping is still there)?
>
Hi Tejun,
I did load a kdump kernel on 32-rc7 and it worked fine. But I guess in
this case memory might have come from linearly mapped region.
If the default per cpu allocator can get memory from vmalloc region also, then
I think we will need this function which can map virtual address to
physical address.
Are there multiple allocators now? If yes, what are the command line
options and I can try to use some other allocator and see if I can force
the condition where memory comes from vmalloc region and I observe the
crash.
Once I can reproduce it, I can also send you the fix you suggested.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 21:22 Kdump issue with percpu_alloc=lpage John Blackwood
2009-11-18 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-11-19 14:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-19 15:20 ` John Blackwood
2009-11-19 16:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-19 16:36 ` Vivek Goyal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-27 19:16 John Blackwood
2009-10-27 19:24 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091119143343.GB8741@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=john.blackwood@ccur.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.