From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370701007D1 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:46:42 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Bug in drivers/serial/of_serial.c? Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:41:27 +0100 References: <8B957E110B62714A84290A01A597805F05CA0AA0@Exchange.discretix.com> <200911191401.37531.arnd@arndb.de> <8B957E110B62714A84290A01A597805F05D2AE44@Exchange.discretix.com> In-Reply-To: <8B957E110B62714A84290A01A597805F05D2AE44@Exchange.discretix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200911191441.27581.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Alon Ziv List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 19 November 2009, Alon Ziv wrote: > Is the following better? > > --- > [PATCH] Xilinx 16550 UART is actually 16550A-compatible > Yes, that's better because it's guaranteed not to break any other system, while fixing yours. I'd still add support for the compatible="ns16550a" property so that we do the right thing for future systems. Arnd <><